Feed quality is perhaps the most important factor influencing ruminant
productivity. Lab analysis is key in estimating the quality and
digestibility of feedstuffs and subsequently formulating balanced
rations. However, the interaction between nutrients are
complicated, and each of the several available quantitative methods is
flawed to some degree. Despite the shortcomings, nutritional
analysis is a useful tool, particularly for comparing various feeds
to one another. Following is a brief description of select measures
of digestibility used to characterize feed.
NDF, ADF & lignin
The quality of a feedstuff depends a great deal on the amount of dietary
fiber it contains. One method of determining the fiber content of a
feed is known as the detergent system. This method provides a
relatively quick measure of the insoluble cell wall matrix (or fiber)
of the feed, as well as a measure of each of its three major
components; hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. These three
materials are quite different in terms of their usefulness to the
ruminant, making this differentiation important when using the
detergent method of estimating feed quality. Cellulose is a key
carbohydrate in the structure of the plant cell wall. It is of low
but variable digestibility. The digestibility of hemicellulose is
somewhat greater than that of cellulose though it is also quite
variable. Lignin is generally considered to be indigestible.
The first value in the table is called NDF, or Neutral Detergent Fiber.
This value represents all non-soluble components of feed, notably
hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. It could be viewed as a 'total
fiber' value. However, this value cannot be assumed to represent
the total indigestible fraction of the feed. As mentioned above,
hemicellulose and cellulose are in fact somewhat available to the
ruminant.
The next value in the table is called ADF, or Acid Detergent Fiber. This
value represents the combined amount of cellulose and lignin in the
feed.
Finally, the value labeled lignin is representative of the lignin portion of
the feed.
It is important to note that this analysis isn't a direct measure of
digestibility. Rather, it is a measure of the various components of
the cell wall. It relies on the relationship between these
components and their assumed digestibility in order to say anything
about the actual quality of the feed. This relationship is variable
and complex so these numbers are only an estimation of quality.
It should also be noted that these values are not to be used
interchangeably with the crude fiber values reported on most feed
labels. Crude fiber values are derived from a completely different
and rather outdated method of quality analysis and there is really no
direct comparison. Sometimes ADF values are used as a substitute for
crude fiber values but it's important to consider that this
practice is not based in solid theory as much as it is in statistical
association.
IVTD
A second estimation of quality we use is called In Vitro Total
Digestibility (IVTD). These results give us an idea of the
digestibility of the feed. The procedure involves collection of
rumen fluid from a fistulated reindeer. This fluid is then used in
the lab to mimic the digestive processes of the rumen. It differs
from the detergent system in that it accounts for enzymatic action
taking place within the rumen and is an actual estimation of the
digestibility of the feed. One of the drawbacks to this type of
biological analysis is the variability of the results. Because the
method utilizes a living system, there is much more room for
experimental error than there is using a chemical method like the
detergent system.
Minerals
For more information about the importance of minerals in ruminant
nutrition, click here.
Back to Nutrition Tables listing.